We were brought in to work on a high-traffic cricket betting site that publishes live scores, odds, and match predictions. The content team was doing everything right. They created fresh prediction pages for every fixture, tips pages for each tournament, and schedule pages for the IPL, PSL, WPL, BBL, The Ashes, and more. On paper, the site should have been ranking. In reality, a large share of those pages were either not indexed at all, indexed with the wrong signals, or dropping out of the index because Google was wasting its crawl budget on the wrong URLs.
The whole niche is time-sensitive. A prediction page for a match tomorrow is worth a lot today and almost nothing a week later. That makes crawl budget, indexing speed, and clean technical signals far more important here than on a typical content site. Google has to discover and crawl each page fast, while it still ranks, and every wasted crawl is a prediction page that never got its shot.
We started, as always, with Google Search Console and a full crawl, comparing what Googlebot could actually reach against what was indexed. Two problems stood out right away.
First, the site was leaking crawl budget in every direction. It kept two full years of match and prediction pages live before applying noindex, so Googlebot was spending its time re-crawling thousands of dead 2024 fixtures instead of this week’s matches. On top of that, category pages used a “Show More” button instead of real pagination. Googlebot does not click, so every fixture behind that button had no internal links pointing to it and was effectively invisible to search.
Second, the pages Google did crawl were sending mixed or broken signals. Old matches carried two robots meta tags in the source at once, handing Google contradictory index and noindex instructions. On the homepage, the title, meta description, and Open Graph tags were rendering right before the closing body tag instead of inside the head, so crawlers and social bots were not reliably reading them. The news sitemap listed every article ever published instead of the last 48 hours, breaking Google News eligibility. A second sitemap was not even referenced from the sitemap index, and match URLs marked noindex were still sitting inside the XML sitemap, contradicting their own tags.
Individually, none of these were exotic. Together, they meant the site’s best, most timely content was competing with one hand tied behind its back.
The core challenge was that the issues were spread across crawling, indexing, rendering, and content signals all at once, and several of them were silently costing rankings without any obvious error in the browser.
noindex URLs left in the sitemap, an orphaned sitemap, and a news sitemap that broke Google News rules were sending Google conflicting instructions about what to index./ipl/, /psl/, /wpl/, /the-ashes/) and dumping all that traffic, plus high-authority backlinks with exact-match anchors like “IPL 2024 odds,” onto a single generic schedule page.We worked in priority order: first stop the crawl-budget bleed, then clean up indexing signals, then speed up indexing of new pages, and finally strengthen the on-page and internal-linking layer.
Crawl budget optimization
/archive/ directory, the original URLs 301-redirect to the new location, and /archive/ is blocked in robots.txt. This preserves user access and backlink equity while stopping Google from wasting crawl budget on expired fixtures.Indexing signals cleanup
noindex match URLs from the XML sitemap and referenced the previously orphaned sitemap from the sitemap index, resolving the conflicts between sitemap inclusion and page-level directives.article:modified_time meta tag to update dynamically, so Google stopped showing a stale “last updated” date in the SERP snippet even though the content refreshed daily.Faster indexing of time-sensitive pages
On-page & Core Web Vitals
The technical foundation went from working against the content team to amplifying it, and the traffic curve shows it.
Because this is a cricket betting and predictions site, organic traffic tracks the match calendar rather than climbing in a straight line. During the busy tournament windows in April and late May the site peaked at roughly 65,000 to 68,000 estimated organic visitors, with an earlier peak near 60,000, and even in quieter, off-season weeks it has held a baseline of around 15,000 to 30,000 estimated organic visitors. Ten months in, the work is ongoing and the site continues to move with the season.
What drove it:
The pattern here is one we see over and over. The content and the search intent were already right, but the technical layer of crawl budget, indexing signals, and speed of indexing was quietly capping everything the business was investing in content. Fix the foundation, and the pages the team is already producing finally get to rank.
The site monetizes through betting operator referrals and affiliate revenue, and organic search is the primary channel driving it. Visibility during live tournaments converts directly into signups and deposits, so the technical work translates straight into revenue.
At the traffic levels above, this organic visibility drives approximately €20,000 per week in revenue, or roughly €86,700 per month.
Against that, the client’s monthly investment in this work is:
That is a combined spend of a little over €8,000 per month returning around €86,700 per month in organic revenue. In other words, every euro invested is returning roughly ten, and the technical foundation that makes it possible is now maintained and improved month over month as new fixtures, tournaments, and seasons roll through.
The engagement has been running for 10 months and is still ongoing.